3 ms·
Is it _really_ censorship though? Surely you can see a difference between posting off-topic information, and suppression. I shouldn't be permitted to post e.g.
by chomp 4y ago
Is it _really_ censorship though? Surely you can see a difference between posting off-topic information, and suppression. I shouldn't be permitted to post e.g. C++ on the C subreddit, because it's not the same thing.
The original post was misleading: https://www.reddit.com/r/cpp/comments/yqjrwx/c_type_erasure_aka_trait_objects_sean_baxter/ https://www.reddit.com/r/cpp/comments/yqjrwx/c_type_erasure_...
Circle Lang is a superset of C++. It isn't C++. Maybe you should frame the post as a feature proposal instead of showing something that C++ can't do, and claiming it as C++. If this isn't your post, then I apologize for the assumption.
EDIT: Looks like someone's done this already and the post is happy: https://www.reddit.com/r/cpp/comments/yriwxr/potential_c_extension_for_type_erasure_as_a/ https://www.reddit.com/r/cpp/comments/yriwxr/potential_c_ext...
- bheadmaster 4y agoIt seems like a communication issue. The mod said that the post was removed for being off-topic - when it was clearly removed for having a misleading title. "Removed for being off-topic" would imply that no other posts about the language would be accepted - it is understandable that this caused a bit of anger in the author. "Removed for having a misleading title" would imply that only the misleading title is offending - and that other posts would be accepted, as long as they didn't have a misleading title. I'm sure if the mod explicitly said this, it wouldn't cause this much of a reaction.