4 ms·
Based on a claim by one anonymous source, that SBF told them that. Might be true, but papers (especially ones like the WSJ) should not publish such pap.
by LatteLazy 4y ago
Based on a claim by one anonymous source, that SBF told them that.
Might be true, but papers (especially ones like the WSJ) should not publish such pap.
- bin_bash 4y agoThere is absolutely 0 chance that the WSJ would run an article with a headline like this without verifying the information with multiple parties. That verification is often off-the-record so you won't read about it in the article.
- cycrutchfield 4y agoAre you not aware of how journalism works?