Why not? What "problem" did the old logo solve? False dichotomy? Does it? The old logo looked like any number of older logos. Lace around book with latin i

Why not? What "problem" did the old logo solve? False dichotomy? Does it? The old logo looked like any number of older logos. Lace around book with latin in it. Not bad, certainly. But "projecting quality?" I don't actually know what the image of Oxford would be. I suppose you could echo back to my "any number of older logos?" I oddly agree with this. But... I also don't see it as a problem?