3 ms·
This is necessarily not the case. The ML model has only been trained on things produced by humans, therefore its derived works. We have no idea what an ML model
by BeefWellington 4y ago
This is necessarily not the case. The ML model has only been trained on things produced by humans, therefore its derived works. We have no idea what an ML model that hadn't been trained by looking at human art would actually produce, and whether or not it is creative.
Also it's pretty clear you haven't worked with many artists from that statement.
- Andrew_nenakhov 4y ago> The ML model has only been trained on things produced by humans, therefore its derived works. Humans are also trained only on things produced by humans. The only exception is nature, but ML model can be trained on photos of nature, too. Also, you are missing the point. > Also it's pretty clear you haven't worked with many artists from that statement. 1. I employed quite a few artists over the past 15 years. 2. I wasn't talking about artists. I was talking about regular humans. The vast majority of them are absolutely unable to create anything resembling Elon Musk riding on a giant sparrow.