4 ms·
> and needs proving why the program’s nature of creative remixing (for lack of a better word If I ask Stable Diffusion to create a picture of Elon Musk wieldin
by Andrew_nenakhov 4y ago
> and needs proving why the program’s nature of creative remixing (for lack of a better word
If I ask Stable Diffusion to create a picture of Elon Musk wielding lightnings and riding a giant blue sparrow over a desert during a storm, the result would be more creative than what could be produced by most humans. I believe that counts as a proof.
- BeefWellington 4y agoThis is necessarily not the case. The ML model has only been trained on things produced by humans, therefore its derived works. We have no idea what an ML model that hadn't been trained by looking at human art would actually produce, and whether or not it is creative. Also it's pretty clear you haven't worked with many artists from that statement.
- Andrew_nenakhov 4y ago> The ML model has only been trained on things produced by humans, therefore its derived works. Humans are also trained only on things produced by humans. The only exception is nature, but ML model can be trained on photos of nature, too. Also, you are missing the point. > Also it's pretty clear you haven't worked with many artists from that statement. 1. I employed quite a few artists over the past 15 years. 2. I wasn't talking about artists. I was talking about regular humans. The vast majority of them are absolutely unable to create anything resembling Elon Musk riding on a giant sparrow.