3 ms·
An important point is whether legislation exists which allows such "monitoring". Edit: I would also like to add, one of the latest news was about malicious ac
by mdp2021 4y ago
An important point is whether legislation exists which allows such "monitoring".
Edit:
I would also like to add, one of the latest news was about malicious access of administrative data in Australia - which surely has in general more funds to invest in security than others. I would be concerned about personal data being copied in more repositories (multiplying chances of malicious access).
- mathieuh 4y agoIsn't that why countries passed non-specific laws? E.g. in the UK we have the Snoopers' Charter: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Investigatory_Powers_Act_2016 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Investigatory_Powers_Act_2016, I believe in the US the Patriot Act did something similar.
- pessimizer 4y agoThat's an important thing to note, so you can recognize it where you live i.e. under what obscure interpretation, of what strangely written law, passed under what conditions, enabled unlimited network surveillance in the countries that have it? Who in your country supports similar legislation?
- nisegami 4y ago>An important point is whether legislation exists which allows such "monitoring". One thing that people from the "global north" need to remember is that in most of the world, laws are just loose guidelines.
- hulitu 4y agoIt is the same in the "global north". See Assange Swedish cases.