5 ms·
Humans are not neural networks, that's just a thesis. Even novelists do not sit all day long in a closed room reading other people's work and then do a collage
by uklgrant 4y ago
Humans are not neural networks, that's just a thesis.
Even novelists do not sit all day long in a closed room reading other people's work and then do a collage of what they've read. Otherwise no books would have been written in the first place.
Cut the AI off humans' work, let it interact with the real world and see what it produces. It will be nothing.
Once (if ever?) an AI is capable of producing an actual original work, I'm fine with other AIs stealing from the first one. Please leave humans alone.
- nomilk 4y ago> Humans are not neural networks That's correct, but it misses the point. This is about reconciling 1. being allowed but 2. not being allowed: 1. The human uses a machine, where the machine is an organic one it grew itself. 2. The human uses a machine, where the machine is one it made or acquired. To a lot of us, there's no difference.
- carpenecopinum 4y ago> Cut the AI off humans' work, let it interact with the real world and see what it produces. It will be nothing. That "experiment" could just as well be done on humans, though, cut them off of any work that any human has done before and you may get simple cave paintings, if you're lucky.
- bayindirh 4y agoDo not underestimate the instincts of any living being. The implicit knowledge and the foundation carried with every one of us is immense. Monkeys have evolved enough to start making their own tools [0]. [0]: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/monkeys-make-stone-ldquo-tools-rdquo-that-bear-a-striking-resemblance-to-early-human-artifacts/ https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/monkeys-make-ston...
- jimktrains2 4y agoSimple cave paintings are much more than nothing.
- sensanaty 4y agoWell let's see the A"I" come up with the equivalent of a cave painting in full isolation, then.