3 ms·
There's an important qualification on that page: > This process will depend on the issue quality, and the impact on the larger user base. So, if I understand
by thayne 4y ago
There's an important qualification on that page:
> This process will depend on the issue quality, and the impact on the larger user base.
So, if I understand correctly, they won't automatically close issues if you aren't a subscriber, but the bar for the quality to keep it open is probably significantly higher.
I don't think that's a bad model. Although, I don' think it would scale well to every open source project having it's own subscription stream. But maybe if there were companies that maintained collections of projects?
- jcparkyn 4y agoYeah that qualification helps a lot.
- ilyt 4y agoDepends on where the bar is set but as long as "A PR that fixes actual bug with nicely written code" passes I think that model is entirely fine (especially in modern era when it can bet mangled thru test suite via CI and merging it is near-zero effort for maintainer). That's essentially someone helping your paid customers to have better product for free.