Regardless of how you feel about piracy, any kind of blocking should never be happening at the DNS level. From an eff.org article[0] about a similar case last y

Regardless of how you feel about piracy, any kind of blocking should never be happening at the DNS level. From an eff.org article[0] about a similar case last year: > This order is profoundly dangerous for several reasons. In the U.S. context, where injunctions like these are usually tied to specious claims of conspiracy, we have long argued that intermediaries which bear no meaningful relationship to the alleged infringement, and cannot therefore be held liable for it, should not be subject to orders like these in the first place. Courts do not have unlimited power; rather, judges should confine their orders to persons that are plausibly accused of infringement or acting in concert with infringers. [0] https://www.eff.org/ja/deeplinks/2021/07/dns-provider-hit-outrageous-blocking-order-your-provider-next https://www.eff.org/ja/deeplinks/2021/07/dns-provider-hit-ou...