> Are doctors, scientists destroying pieces of our human heritage or blocking roads? Nope Yes - several have. See this example of scientists carrying out a glu

> Are doctors, scientists destroying pieces of our human heritage or blocking roads? Nope Yes - several have. See this example of scientists carrying out a gluing protest and committing criminal damage: https://theconversation.com/extinction-rebellion-scientists-why-we-glued-ourselves-to-a-government-department-181799 https://theconversation.com/extinction-rebellion-scientists-... They were acquitted by the courts. So do you think this particular women should be treated as a terrorist? https://news.sky.com/video/just-stop-oil-activist-bursts-into-tears-during-m25-protest-12741084 https://news.sky.com/video/just-stop-oil-activist-bursts-int... And should all these protestors (including doctors) who blocked a bridge - should they also be treated as terrorists? https://news.sky.com/story/climate-protesters-sit-in-road-and-block-major-bridges-in-london-12709189 https://news.sky.com/story/climate-protesters-sit-in-road-an... > just because they oppose the left (from where the term originated from), they aren't "nazis" Who was talking about Nazis? There is nothing wrong with being more on the right side of the political spectrum. I don't affiliate myself as either left or right. I support politicians who will improve things for society and protect our environment and not see politics as a career to enrich themselves or gain power. This particular politician who said the protestors are RAF like - Mr Dobrindt - seems to be one of those politicians who are in the pockets of big car manufacturers. He called the German Green Party a bunch of "Rioters, Stone throwers and Arsonists". That's extremely unprofessional. But it seems you're in favor of treating young protestors as terrorists rather than finding solutions to get our leaders to act to adapt and avoid the worst outcomes of the climate crisis? Don't look up, right? > that your commitment here is with the agenda and not with the truth. What agenda? What truth?