4 ms·
In a word, no. I’ve spent a lot of time on SEO over the past couple years, and inbound links still matter a lot to search rankings and traffic. This is clear ev
by snowwrestler 4y ago
In a word, no. I’ve spent a lot of time on SEO over the past couple years, and inbound links still matter a lot to search rankings and traffic. This is clear evidence that PageRank still matters.
From a more macro perspective, I’ll believe Google is failing when a competitor starts eating their lunch. What I see right now are a bunch of would-be competitors who want to eat their lunch, including this company. The blog post is probably best understood as aspirational rather than descriptive.
As a user of search, Google results are frustrating at times, but is that because “pagerank is over?” Or because it’s an incredibly hard problem they’re working on? Google does not have to be objectively perfect to keep succeeding, they just need to be better than other search engines.
- thfuran 4y agoI think they're more like trying to grab several of the crumbs that Google left behind. I don't think it's possible for a paid search engine to eat Google's lunch.
- Semaphor 4y agoYeah, the devs stated again and again, that they don’t plan or expect to be a mainstream search engine.
- twelve40 4y agomaybe I'm slow today, but I didn't get from their long rant what did they replace page rank with? I get it, ads suck, SEO spam sucks, PR is gameable, serving the user is noble. But, how did they solve the actual problem of ranking the search results?