I appreciate the source code release, but there needs to be a software license in the repo to allow users to discern whether the code is free and open source, o

I appreciate the source code release, but there needs to be a software license in the repo to allow users to discern whether the code is free and open source, or just source-available. Without a license, the code is only source-available because no exemptions to automatic copyright protections have been granted. Also, the graphic in the announcement uses the Open Source Initiative's trademarked logo, which is reserved for software released under OSI-approved licenses: > The OSI logo is a trademark of Open Source Initiative. In order to protect and grow the OSI brand, we have a distinguishable logo that can be used to mark software licensed under an OSI Approved License. When displaying the OSI logo, please follow our standard Trademark Guidelines. https://opensource.org/logo-usage-guidelines#The_OSI_Logo:_Usage_Guidelines https://opensource.org/logo-usage-guidelines#The_OSI_Logo:_U...