4 ms·
Why does it need a "real source"? ARM sells architecture licenses, Apple has a custom ARM architecture. 1 + 1 = 2. https://www.cnet.com/tech/tech-industry/appl
by ksherlock 4y ago
Why does it need a "real source"? ARM sells architecture licenses, Apple has a custom ARM architecture. 1 + 1 = 2.
https://www.cnet.com/tech/tech-industry/apple-seen-as-likely-new-arm-licensee/ https://www.cnet.com/tech/tech-industry/apple-seen-as-likely...
"ARM Chief Executive Warren East revealed on an earnings conference call on Wednesday that "a leading handset OEM," or original equipment manufacturer, has signed an architectural license with the company, forming ARM's most far-reaching license for its processor cores. East declined to elaborate on ARM's new partner, but EETimes' Peter Clarke could think of only one smartphone maker who would be that interested in shaping and controlling the direction of the silicon inside its phones: Apple."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mac_transition_to_Apple_silicon#Processor_development https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mac_transition_to_Apple_silico...
"In 2008, Apple bought processor company P.A. Semi for US$278 million.[28][29] At the time, it was reported that Apple bought P.A. Semi for its intellectual property and engineering talent.[30] CEO Steve Jobs later claimed that P.A. Semi would develop system-on-chips for Apple's iPods and iPhones.[6] Following the acquisition, Apple signed a rare "Architecture license" with ARM, allowing the company to design its own core, using the ARM instruction set.[31] The first Apple-designed chip was the A4, released in 2010, which debuted in the first-generation iPad, then in the iPhone 4. Apple subsequently released a number of products with its own processors."
https://www.anandtech.com/show/7112/the-arm-diaries-part-1-how-arms-business-model-works/3 https://www.anandtech.com/show/7112/the-arm-diaries-part-1-h...
"Finally at the top of the pyramid is an ARM architecture license. Marvell, Apple and Qualcomm are some examples of the 15 companies that have this license."
- kalleboo 4y agoThe common refrain is that "Since Apple helped found ARM they have a super special relationship that gives them more rights than anyone else." That they had to specifically sign an architectural license in 2008 sounds like that is not at all true but that they are just another standard licensee (albeit one with very deep pockets).
- Vt71fcAqt7 4y agoI should have been more explicit. I am questioning the claim that Apple has "full control on ARM" with no restriction on the cores they make, grandfathered in from the 1980s. Nobody has ever substantiated that claim.