The argument in this case seems all kinds of weird. Basically, it seems to be that Amazon, by restricting third party sellers of Apple products from its marketp

The argument in this case seems all kinds of weird. Basically, it seems to be that Amazon, by restricting third party sellers of Apple products from its marketplace, is somehow engaged in a horizontal price-fixing agreement with Apple. This is despite the fact that the only products whose produced by Apple are affected, are involved - which is sort of the definition of vertical price-fixing - and neither Amazon nor Apple control the prices of other vendors, only whether or not they're allowed on Amazon's platform - which is not in any case an exclusive channel for Apple products.