3 ms·
But why not do both? I find that nice commit messages make it easier on the review to see whats going on rather than a bunch of wip commits. Then squash all of
by ajorgensen 4y ago
But why not do both? I find that nice commit messages make it easier on the review to see whats going on rather than a bunch of wip commits. Then squash all of the commits into a single commit with a nice title and message. The benefits of the squash at the end are, assuming you require tests pass before merge, you have a history of commits all with passing builds which makes bisect possible.
- mixmastamyk 4y agoWouldn't the cleanup work be lost in the squash?