2 ms·
But I've most often seen rebase used, as in OP, to squash multiple commits into ONE commit that covers the feature that was added. I feel like the outcome of r
by jrochkind1 4y ago
But I've most often seen rebase used, as in OP, to squash multiple commits into ONE commit that covers the feature that was added.
I feel like the outcome of rebase used there is to give you what you are asking for, and without rebase you wouldn't be getting it?
(I have very mixed feelings toward rebase, myself)
- prepend 4y agoWhy does this matter? I can just diff from the first commit before to some point if I really want to see it all wrapped up. It seems like lots of work that almost always does not matter. I don’t think git is a good project management system. If I want easy to read stuff I can look at the release notes or tag notes or whatnot.