4 ms·
...Except, in the engineering sense, dealing with rough surfaces/potholes should absolutely be filed under "normal use". If someone built a car that wasn't at l
by salawat 4y ago
...Except, in the engineering sense, dealing with rough surfaces/potholes should absolutely be filed under "normal use". If someone built a car that wasn't at least checked for behavior in media real, I certainly would have rather profound concerns over it's manufacture.
- bheadmaster 4y ago> Except, in the engineering sense, dealing with rough surfaces/potholes should absolutely be filed under "normal use". I never claimed otherwise. The engineers' original model of function was faulty, and should've included rough surfaces/potholes. But since it (obviously) didn't, that makes rough surfaces/potholes an exceptional circumstance in the context of their model.