3 ms·

It's wild to me that a CEO can simultaneously take responsibility for the decision to over hire, and also suffer none of the financial consequences. In fact, ME

It's wild to me that a CEO can simultaneously take responsibility for the decision to over hire, and also suffer none of the financial consequences. In fact, META stock is up 7% on this news, so Zuck has made money on this decision. I think that's a major inefficiency in modern corporations. Executives are the last to face consequences when they make a bad decision.

Invictus0 4y ago
Zucc's net worth is down more than $100B? Should he lose an arm too?
bsaul 4y ago
if you think stock up means zuck made money for this (good) decision, then you've got to admit stock being down 50% during the last year was zuck loosing money based on his previous (bad) decisions..