3 ms·
I definitely agree with 1. I find the inclusion of core language features in std:: to be rather disconcerting. I've always thought of std:: as a set of standard
by taylorius 4y ago
I definitely agree with 1. I find the inclusion of core language features in std:: to be rather disconcerting. I've always thought of std:: as a set of standard useful library functions, separate from actual language features.
- kllrnohj 4y agoThat's what it is. It's a useful utility function over non standard compiler built-ins. The alternative would be a new keyword, but then the go-to complaint would just be about c++ keyword bloat and source compat regressions