> I couldn't understand what is illegal from the article. See the link in the first sentence of the article and, if necessary, scroll down a bit to the "Englis

> I couldn't understand what is illegal from the article. See the link in the first sentence of the article and, if necessary, scroll down a bit to the "English Version" heading: <https://rewis.io/urteile/urteil/lhm-20-01-2022-3-o-1749320/ https://rewis.io/urteile/urteil/lhm-20-01-2022-3-o-1749320/> In short, importing a remote font exposes the user's IP to the font provider, which (that court has ruled) is a violation of the GDPR: > The disclosure of the user's IP address in the above-mentioned manner and the associated encroachment on the general right of personality is so significant with regard to the loss of control over a personal data to a company that is known to collect data about its users, and the individual discomfort felt by the user as a result, that a claim for damages is justified.