5 ms·
It's honestly pretty risky. I imagine quite a lot of confidential information is in email.
by fleddr 4y ago
It's honestly pretty risky. I imagine quite a lot of confidential information is in email.
- bombcar 4y agoLocal caches etc make that risk already extant.
- optymizer 4y agoThere's some discussion and code in email, but most of it is on Workplace. We don't use email much. I have 32500 unread emails.
- YeBanKo 4y agoThey may archive old emails and allow only new email be sent/read.
- phonebucket 4y ago> We don't use email much. I have 32500 unread emails. That many unreads makes it sound like everyone is using emails except you!
- optymizer 4y agoHa, it's mostly notifications of updates and comments from either Workplace, Phabricator or Tasks. An email sent to me is going to be drowned in a sea of notification emails and it's very unlikely I would read it. I'd set up filters to clean up the inbox, but it just so happens that when something of significance happens, it's usually on Workchat or Workplace, so I don't bother with e-mail.
- TecoAndJix 4y agoMy guess is all email activity for the remainder of the time will be closely monitored and audited by their security/compliance team
- pcurve 4y agoCompanies have email content scanner that detect business sensitive information. They work pretty well.
- ct0 4y agoAt my org I cant even send my own SSN that's embedded on a zipped PDF. I too was surprised how well they work.
- sebdufbeau 4y agoMight be wrong, but isn't the workaround to this usually just putting a password on the .zip file?