4 ms·
I know very little about the embedded world. Does anyone familiar with that space know how this compares to SQLite?
by koshergweilo 4y ago
I know very little about the embedded world. Does anyone familiar with that space know how this compares to SQLite?
- ddorian43 4y agoSQLite is too high level. Maybe compare it with LMDB.
- danielEM 4y agoI would like also to see comparison with lmdb, didn't dig into code, but from doc I didn't see it supporting multithreading
- rroot 4y agoI came to ask this. I went straight onto the website to look for SQLite comparison. It's after all the dominating embedded database. I do realize the use cases can be different, but then say and show that in the comparison. (I'm trying to be helpful by offering unsolicited advice :) - Brilliant work!
- formerly_proven 4y agoSQLite is roughly 200x more code.
- CyberDildonics 4y ago6MB vs 100KB, which is 60x.
- nurettin 4y agoI haven't checked, but they probably try to retain buffers as long as possible in order to reduce reads and writes.
- sohkamyung 4y agoMaybe not. This is listed as a key feature: > Very small footprint, ram usage is almost 0;
- goutham2688 4y agoSQLite is a relational database, while FlashDB seems to be concentrating on key-value and time-series https://armink.github.io/FlashDB/#/README?id=usage-scenario https://armink.github.io/FlashDB/#/README?id=usage-scenario