> How do you “control”, when it’s a (high quality) report of a single autopsy? By testing for and ruling out the myriad causes of myocarditis and ANE with alre

> How do you “control”, when it’s a (high quality) report of a single autopsy? By testing for and ruling out the myriad causes of myocarditis and ANE with already-established causal links, as I described above. > The idea would be to encourage other autopsies which look for similar pathology. And if those other autopsies fail to even so much as mention other more-well-known causes of myocarditis and ANE (let alone make any effort to rule out said causes), then they, too, will consequently fail to demonstrate causation. > The foreign mRNA was supposed to stay at the injection site in the upper arm. Okay, and it's good to know that it doesn't. That still doesn't do anything to establish a causal relationship between spike protein production and tissue damage.