This argument’s logical error is approaching a response to a statements as if it exists in isolation. The person you are replying to was merely offering an exa

This argument’s logical error is approaching a response to a statements as if it exists in isolation. The person you are replying to was merely offering an example to contradict a blanket statement without a factual basis, essentially that Apple does not track users because the user is already logged in. The respondent presented a situation in which that reason would not apply. Also, your way of engaging people in this way is annoying -- specifically starting every reply with 'This argument’s logical error' and then coming up with a seems-right-at-a-glance breakdown of their argument's faults. Are you doing it on purpose to annoy people?