"...6 people interviewing me serially. That sort of thing is grueling..." This sort of thing is a standard process in many companies - precisely to avoid the s

"...6 people interviewing me serially. That sort of thing is grueling..." This sort of thing is a standard process in many companies - precisely to avoid the single-person bias mentioned in other post. Besides, the interviewers (in the properly organized case) are usually one's future coworkers - and if you did not like them maybe working there would not have been a good idea for you to begin with. "...didn't have much enthusiasm for the next 3 interviews..." - this is your mistake. You should have treated them totally indepentently, and possibly asked the other interviewers about the incorrect question. Chances are they'd corrected that guy during the offline discussion. "A company that would allow someone with social interaction issues run an interview is very problematic." - not at all. They gave that person a chance to learn. They gave you a chance to preview your future coworkers and make a decision. I think multi-person interviews are a critical part of getting a good atmosphere in the team.