2 ms·
How do you “control”, when it’s a (high quality) report of a single autopsy? The idea would be to encourage other autopsies which look for similar pathology.
by wrycoder 4y ago
How do you “control”, when it’s a (high quality) report of a single autopsy?
The idea would be to encourage other autopsies which look for similar pathology.
The key thing here is finding spike protein WITHOUT CAPSID protein in areas where the vaccine was not supposed to produce any protein (brain and heart). The foreign mRNA was supposed to stay at the injection site in the upper arm.
- yellowapple 4y ago> How do you “control”, when it’s a (high quality) report of a single autopsy? By testing for and ruling out the myriad causes of myocarditis and ANE with already-established causal links, as I described above. > The idea would be to encourage other autopsies which look for similar pathology. And if those other autopsies fail to even so much as mention other more-well-known causes of myocarditis and ANE (let alone make any effort to rule out said causes), then they, too, will consequently fail to demonstrate causation. > The foreign mRNA was supposed to stay at the injection site in the upper arm. Okay, and it's good to know that it doesn't. That still doesn't do anything to establish a causal relationship between spike protein production and tissue damage.