4 ms·

The OP didn't advance the Lost Tribes conjecture. There is no need for such a sneering response.

• recuter 4y ago
  How do you figure? (I'll point out that he himself somewhat reluctantly already said that it actually might be derived from it and he is unsure) Whichever heretofore unnamed conjecture he did advance overlaps exactly. I humbly and respectfully accept that it can be some strange coincidence. It is hypothetically entirely possible that it could be some other theory - one need only cite the author to clear it all up. All my links are from googling what OP wrote. I respectfully posit the most charitable possible explanation that OP could perhaps be spreading Lost Tribes theories unwittingly. Why dance around the issue? OP need only lookup whatever he did advance. There is truly nothing to argue about - if it is some other theory I defer to his good judgment as I am not a linguist.
  • biorach 4y ago
    Not replying further due to your condescending tone.
    • deleted 4y ago
      [deleted]
    • recuter 4y ago
      Rest assured that my tone is extremely polite. As such, I fail to see the relevance of your comment.