We kinda do have it; it's just mostly useless, given the linking clause. (Not entirely useless, though, as that article sets out.) GPL and AGPL have the same l

We kinda do have it; it's just mostly useless, given the linking clause. (Not entirely useless, though, as that article sets out.) GPL and AGPL have the same layout, so you can just take the LGPL, and replace all references to 'GPL' and 'GNU General Public License' with 'AGPL' and 'GNU Affero General Public License'. Of course, you couldn't call that license 'GNU ALGPL' or 'GNU LAGPL'; you'd have to come up with your own name. (Disclaimer: I'm not a lawyer, and I haven't checked this as thoroughly as I would if I were going to use this for my own software.) Maybe it's worth bothering Bradley M. Kuhn (http://ebb.org/bkuhn/ http://ebb.org/bkuhn/) again and seeing what the current status of a Lesser AGPL is?