3 ms·
I feel like I've suffered through this type of "leadership" for the past decade. When it works, it's great (although I feel you've kind of traded traditional au
by zppln 4y ago
I feel like I've suffered through this type of "leadership" for the past decade. When it works, it's great (although I feel you've kind of traded traditional authority for slight manipulation/scheming on part of the leader in such instances). These instances have also always involved more experienced team members.
When it doesn't work it's useless. Instead of just getting told to drive straight off a cliff you get to wander around in a forest for a while and when you eventually find out you're lost it's way too late.
As always (and as TFA points out) the person you pick for a leader still needs to actually possess whatever skill set your flavor of the month leadership style requires.
- macfarbt 4y agoSuffer is the right word for when it's not carefully executed or understood. Self organising or autonomous teams is not a replacement for strategy, vision or a clear task. That's leaderless organizations which isn't a good thing. Who grants the authority to the team is a skill to test and develop. The point of the research is to find such leaders by what they actually do and how, not what they say they do.