4 ms·
> In not so many words, it meant that Russia would have to join the transnational gang as a foot soldier (Estonia) rather than a capo (UK) let alone a boss (US)
by hbrn 4y ago
> In not so many words, it meant that Russia would have to join the transnational gang as a foot soldier (Estonia) rather than a capo (UK) let alone a boss (US).
And what do you think makes US and UK above others? Here's a hint: US and UK are two highest NATO spenders.
What NATO expenses was Russia able to afford in the early 2000s?
Sounds like they wanted to be treated as a boss while chipping in as a foot soldier.
- pydry 4y agoWithout an enemy who even cares? This was a diplomatic easy win that would have prevented a catastrophically expensive war IF you assume peace is the ultimate goal.
- hbrn 4y agoWhat makes you believe peace would be the only natural outcome? Putin turned out to be an authoritarian dictator with imperialistic beliefs, peace is rarely an option with those guys. Russia being a part of NATO could allow them to invade not just Ukraine, but also Poland and Baltic States. Do you believe Putin would not become a dictator if Russia joined NATO? It is entirely possible, but far from guaranteed.