4 ms·
> [2] - https://twitter.com/janeqiuchina/status/1589098167051911169 https://twitter.com/janeqiuchina/status/1589098167051911169 Since you put the Twitter handl
by we_never_see_it 4y ago
> [2] - https://twitter.com/janeqiuchina/status/1589098167051911169 https://twitter.com/janeqiuchina/status/1589098167051911169
Since you put the Twitter handle as an evidence for your argument. This particular Chinese jounalist is using Twitter and publishing articles in Western journals *while living in China*. What makes you think she is more trustworthy than Steve Bannon? Even if she is an honest and trustworthy person why would CCP let her publish anything that goes against their narrative?
> just that the actual physical evidence we have today about this virus and this pandemic overwhelmingly points to a natural origin
actual physical evidence *provided by China* FTFY. You don't think China will readily handover the data to you if it came from lab, do you? And what physical evidence? The evidences are just some early patient data and virus gene sequences. By that logic HIV spillover happened in US, not in Africa. Because early HIV cases have been detected in USA.
> overwhelmingly points to a natural origin
according to whom? The virologists who also have a history of covering up lab leaks. The virologists who will have the most to lose if lab leak is true. [1]
[1] https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/20/world/europe/coronavirus-lab-anthrax.html https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/20/world/europe/coronavirus-...