3 ms·
What conversation are you trying to start exactly? That there is some god who is the only one who can judge if something is right or wrong? And that whole coun
by stefanvdw1 4y ago
What conversation are you trying to start exactly?
That there is some god who is the only one who can judge if something is right or wrong? And that whole countries can hide behind this?
It’s pretty clear what “problematic” is, no? The mistreatment of whole subgroups based on their gender or sexuality in Quatar is objectively wrong, or as you would like it defined: Problematic.
- trashdigitalnom 4y agoYou mispelled subjective wrong.
- monlockandkey 4y agoWhere did you get this notion that Qatar is objectively wrong? That is what I am trying to find. People say X is wrong. Ok cool but why is that the case? Why does yourself or your society have authority to decide that this is wrong? A few decades ago it was wrong in western society. Now it is morally correct. So is the morality and understanding of the world pinned to the Anglo-sphere?
- stefanvdw1 4y agoIf you need to be convinced that mistreating people is wrong there is no point arguing. The fact that decades ago something was considered wrong, and since has been accepted, makes it no excuse for it to be considered wrong today. And no, the morality and understanding of the world should not be pinned to the Anglo-sphere, but the west just happens to be the most progressive in terms of human rights at this moment in history. If Quatar wants to take the lead and ask all other countries to follow, by all means.