3 ms·
>I'll always be shocked that she was guilty of deceiving investors and not patients Deceiving patients implies the Theranos tech was being used in "production"
by rs_rs_rs_rs_rs 4y ago
>I'll always be shocked that she was guilty of deceiving investors and not patients
Deceiving patients implies the Theranos tech was being used in "production" and I don't think that was the case.
- gtk40 4y agoDoes the Walgreens partnership not count because it was more of a public trial but not production?
- davidhariri 4y agoI think it was at Walgreen’s, no?
- brian_herman 4y agoNo, I think they had a contract but weren't performing tests yet.
- projektfu 4y agoThey were running a handful of tests on their proprietary machines. They were also diluting blood samples and running them on off-the-shelf machines. (cf. WSJ, the Dropout podcast)