5 ms·
Yes. The point of LGPL in concept is there is a clear boundary where you can modify and replace code. You can't replace a statically linked library.
by TingPing 4y ago
Yes. The point of LGPL in concept is there is a clear boundary where you can modify and replace code. You can't replace a statically linked library.
- jcelerier 4y agoAnd yet https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#LGPLStaticVsDynamic https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#LGPLStaticVsDynami...
- TingPing 4y agoI don't think that conflicts with what I said. You have to be able to replace the library and them shipping linkable objects does that. Most static releases do not do this.
- jcelerier 4y agoThe proprietary ones which use LGPL libraries do - it's uncommon as it's a bit more work for the proprietary dev but it happens