> That was the primary tactical doctrine in 1919. As I understand it, this is not quite accurate. Trenches are pretty resilient to artillery fire. Especially s

> That was the primary tactical doctrine in 1919. As I understand it, this is not quite accurate. Trenches are pretty resilient to artillery fire. Especially shitty WWI artillery. Trench rushes tended to be pretty effective, but it was very difficult to solidify any gains because the enemy would always have a second line of trenches to quickly counterattack while you were inevitably overextended. The modern precise artillery and intel of the west at least is effective on an entirely different level where supply lines far behind the front are in danger. > Seeing a pattern here? That military tech evolves? I mean, yeah, obviously. The claim being addressed here is that things don't become obsolete. Many things do.