4 ms·
Ok... I'm failing to form the abstract connections necessary to understand the point you're getting at here. Is the implication that it's inherently unethical
by chaorace 4y ago
Ok... I'm failing to form the abstract connections necessary to understand the point you're getting at here.
Is the implication that it's inherently unethical to subject others to stimuli under the presumption that the stimulation is uniformly harmless? Surely that's the whole point of studies like this; to rigorously probe such assumptions within the relative safety of a controlled experiment?
- mkmk3 4y agoI think the parent is saying that under those conditions, the "undetectable" part of the title may be in question.
- twawaaay 4y agoI just find funny the idea that people might spun research into something they aren't able to do themselves but is completely obvious to everybody else. Not saying it is the case here, just pointing a potential for humour.