> Popper has produced the best description of science’s epistemic underpinnings thus far Ok, sure. > allowing science to progress without imploding under the

> Popper has produced the best description of science’s epistemic underpinnings thus far Ok, sure. > allowing science to progress without imploding under the demands of positivism How is giving a description of something necessary for its continued progress? Were people not having sex before evolutionary psychologists and biologists elucidated how and why?