3 ms·
While walking I've almost been hit by cyclists performing "Idaho stops". It was one of the big things that turned me against the movement to promote cycling as
by harimau777 4y ago
While walking I've almost been hit by cyclists performing "Idaho stops". It was one of the big things that turned me against the movement to promote cycling as a form of transportation/commuting.
- elfatizer 4y agoCars hit pedestrians all the time, and at much greater consequence. The lack of infrastructure that gives any amount of space for cyclists (or walkers, for that matter) is to blame far more than the cyclists.
- hooverd 4y ago"Drivers are mean to me so I get to be mean to pedestrians" isn't the excuse you think it is.
- eckmLJE 4y agoThis person wasn't performing an "Idaho stop" if they failed to yield to a pedestrian. They were just riding recklessly. Are you also against using cars for commuting, since they kill pedestrians all the time?
- dktoao 4y agoSomeone rode by you a little too close on a bicycle and now you want everyone to have to use less efficient forms of transportation, worsening the climate crisis? Wow, is all I can say.
- actionablefiber 4y agoI really am amused by how _extremely_ abundant the anecdotes are of "almost" being hit by a bike, yet when it comes to cars, the anecdotes are typically of being _actually, really_ hit. In reality bicycles have extremely good maneuverability and visibility, combined with lower speeds and a small hitbox. As someone who frequently walks and cycles I feel that on foot, something might "feel" like a near miss when the rider was in fact in complete control the entire time or was able to avert a crash due to all the inherent advantages bikes have for reacting quickly and decisively.
- harimau777 4y agoIf someone wants special treatment (in this case, being allowed to ignore stop signs), then I would expect them to be held to a higher standard of behavior.
- actionablefiber 4y agoBy default people riding bicycles present an enormously lower risk profile and negligible externalities. I would not call the Idaho stop "special" treatment so much as I would call it an appropriate treatment for the type of vehicle that a bicycle is. And for the same reason I think it's nonsensical to hold people in bicycles to a higher standard on anything. No noise pollution. No air pollution. Requires only a fraction of the amount of public space cars do for mobility and storage. Massively improved visibility of surroundings w/r/t cars. Smaller hitbox with lower weights and lower speeds, translating into a massively reduced momentum differential in a collision, plus way more runway and maneuverability for avoiding the collision to start with. The Idaho Stop improves safety for cyclists because maintaining speed and visibility through a junction while slowing down cars mitigates the risk of a right hook. Telling everyone that they should categorically expect this behavior and that it is legal improves safety for everyone. I as a pedestrian and cyclist in DC expect Idaho stops from other bicycle users and act accordingly, the same way I expect pedestrians to jaywalk anywhere and anytime they want and act accordingly, and it's all quite safe.