3 ms·
The ontological argument is a valid deduction > A, B implies not A thus not B The problem is that you have to prove both A and (B implies not A), without self
by afiori 4y ago
The ontological argument is a valid deduction
> A, B implies not A thus not B
The problem is that you have to prove both A and (B implies not A), without self referentially assuming it in the first place,
- quickthrower2 4y agoSounds like proof by contradiction
- quickthrower2 4y agoAlso the definition of an alibi!