3 ms·

I don't know why you are saying anything to me since you are responding to something I didn't say and that has nothing to do with the post I made. Is "dim witt

I don't know why you are saying anything to me since you are responding to something I didn't say and that has nothing to do with the post I made. Is "dim witted attempts to respond to poorly thought out strawmen" really the level of discourse here?

maratd 15y ago
What? Who are you responding to?
- SomeOtherGuy 15y ago
  You. You may want to consider that if there's two replies to your post, and both are "your post is entirely irrelevant", then perhaps your post genuinely is entirely irrelevant. Protip: read the whole thread from the top.
  - maratd 15y ago
    Where did I say "dim witted attempts to respond to poorly thought out strawmen" or "your post is entirely irrelevant"? Either you're confusing me with someone else or you don't understand the concept of quotes.
    - SomeOtherGuy 15y ago
      Again, read the entire thread. I am not confusing you with anyone else, and I understand the concept of quotes. You are failing to grasp the context of posts, and assuming everything anyone puts in quotes must be a statement you made. There are other people who post, why on earth would you think "your post is entirely irrelevant" is something I claim you said? I very clearly pointed out that two people replied to you saying that your post is irrelevant.
      - maratd 15y ago
        > I very clearly pointed out that two people replied to you saying that your post is irrelevant. So you're just repeating what other people said? To make yourself feel better? Still a bit confused.
        SomeOtherGuy 15y ago
        >Still a bit confused Clearly that is not a situation I can remedy for you. I suggested you read the thread, as that would resolve the confusion for anyone with basic reading comprehension skills. If that is not sufficient for you, then you'll need to ask an adult to explain the words you don't understand.

3 ms·

I don't know why you are saying anything to me since you are responding to something I didn't say and that has nothing to do with the post I made. Is "dim witt

by SomeOtherGuy 15y ago

maratd 15y ago
What? Who are you responding to?
- SomeOtherGuy 15y ago
  You. You may want to consider that if there's two replies to your post, and both are "your post is entirely irrelevant", then perhaps your post genuinely is entirely irrelevant. Protip: read the whole thread from the top.
  - maratd 15y ago
    Where did I say "dim witted attempts to respond to poorly thought out strawmen" or "your post is entirely irrelevant"? Either you're confusing me with someone else or you don't understand the concept of quotes.
    - SomeOtherGuy 15y ago
      Again, read the entire thread. I am not confusing you with anyone else, and I understand the concept of quotes. You are failing to grasp the context of posts, and assuming everything anyone puts in quotes must be a statement you made. There are other people who post, why on earth would you think "your post is entirely irrelevant" is something I claim you said? I very clearly pointed out that two people replied to you saying that your post is irrelevant.
      - maratd 15y ago
        > I very clearly pointed out that two people replied to you saying that your post is irrelevant. So you're just repeating what other people said? To make yourself feel better? Still a bit confused.
        SomeOtherGuy 15y ago
        >Still a bit confused Clearly that is not a situation I can remedy for you. I suggested you read the thread, as that would resolve the confusion for anyone with basic reading comprehension skills. If that is not sufficient for you, then you'll need to ask an adult to explain the words you don't understand.