Wouldn't Scholze be a counterexample to the thesis that young people can't do fundamental contributions? I would say that it supports the idea that only young

Wouldn't Scholze be a counterexample to the thesis that young people can't do fundamental contributions? I would say that it supports the idea that only young people are able to change the fundations of maths, while older people can still use the existing techniques to push the bord, specially on those super technical fields where experience and knowledge are an advantage.