If ever there was a case for 'This thread is useless without pics!' coverage of this story is it. No-one is publishing photos of the guy in question, so we can

If ever there was a case for 'This thread is useless without pics!' coverage of this story is it. No-one is publishing photos of the guy in question, so we can judge for ourselves. And, before someone mentions 'libel' or 'rights to privacy'; the facial recognition expert claims to be '100% certain'. If so, why not 'publish and be damned'?