5 ms·
Yes. What kind of bullshit question is that? The claim is “widespread evidence of fraud”. I’d like to see any of the widespread evidence and not hand wavey bac
by llbeansandrice 4y ago
Yes. What kind of bullshit question is that?
The claim is “widespread evidence of fraud”. I’d like to see any of the widespread evidence and not hand wavey back tracking to “could be compromised”.
- cudgy 4y agoIt doesn’t have to be widespread in order to have a widespread impact. Some national elections are extremely close and essentially decided in one county of a single swing state. Most local elections are by definition “local” and close local elections can be decided by the votes from a single voting precinct. Requiring the evidence to be widespread in order to acknowledge the risk is real and impactful is shortsighted and “hand wavy”.