4 ms·
Without getting into numerical number systems, assembler C macros with threads/fibers without using gcode. But that might just be a macs thing with/without enc
by sargstuff 4y ago
Without getting into numerical number systems, assembler C macros with threads/fibers without using gcode.
But that might just be a macs thing with/without enclosures, depending upon how parsed.
Future C++ standard might relegate that into obsolescence, unless an infinity fabric of busy beavers crashes all computer multiverses first.
Much more clarity/simplicity with a 'halt, catch fire' closure than enumerating every possible applicative option.
**
Where art / science / engineering intersect/diverge/merge/differ?
***
Obsolete's the necessity of a coder, scripter and programmer walking into a bar, at least in theory.
For a given use case, depends on the IDE / framework using to unwind the stack.
To much stack foo, and software developer will likely wind up walking into the bar and generate/raise an Exception to handle the issue at a later point in time.
- sargstuff 4y agoTraditionally, who takes care of automation scripts with to many changes. aka compile it to lock in changes.