4 ms·

I don't get how one who is interested in the continuity of humanity would willingly vote for the "any election we don't win is fraudulent" party. I disagree wi

I don't get how one who is interested in the continuity of humanity would willingly vote for the "any election we don't win is fraudulent" party. I disagree with the democrats on many things, but to vote for the republicans at this stage is to vote for the US to turn into China -- a country ruled by a strongman who answers to no one.

db48x 4y ago
When Trump was elected, it was the Democrats saying that the election was fraudulent. They repeated this message over and over and over on television, in personal appearances, etc. Shall we go to archive.org and dig up the archived video?
- dudul 4y ago
  It was already the case when Bush Jr was elected.
  - db48x 4y ago
    Oh, absolutely, but the further back you look the harder it will be to find the actual recordings. My point is only that it is revisionist to call the Republicans the “"any election we don't win is fraudulent" party”, when both parties have indulged in that fantasy over and over. Honestly, it’s best to assume that both parties are cheating as hard as they possibly can. Certainly low–level frauds are found out in every election.
    - skinnymuch 4y ago
      It’s about relatives. The amount done for Trump in 2016 is no where close to 2020. It’s not even remotely close.
      - db48x 4y ago
        I’m sure we can defer to your superior counting skills.
        skinnymuch 4y ago
        Yeah big stuff like google trends, headline counts, and various other possible statistics. Of course it’s not just my opinion.
- deleted 4y ago
  [deleted]
- kmos17 4y ago
  Ah the whattaboutism rears its head. Trump is the first candidate to refuse to concede a loss in a presidential election, even announcing before the election that he would refuse to accept a loss. Clinton conceded to him even though she was ahead by more then 3 million votes. There always were election deniers, just never a sitting president willing to push his supporters to attack congress because he didn’t want to concede and then cowardly abandon them once they failed overturning the certification. You could also count Stacy Abrams although considering her opponent was in charge of the electoral process her reluctance to concede could be a bit more understandable.
newaccount2021 4y ago
sarcasmatwork 4y ago
You mean the Dems? Here's 12min of Dems doing what you're trying to blame GOP for. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XX2Ejqjz6TA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XX2Ejqjz6TA China controls the Bidens, not the GOP. You have your parties mixed up.

db48x 4y ago

When Trump was elected, it was the Democrats saying that the election was fraudulent. They repeated this message over and over and over on television, in personal appearances, etc. Shall we go to archive.org and dig up the archived video?

dudul 4y ago
It was already the case when Bush Jr was elected.
- db48x 4y ago
  Oh, absolutely, but the further back you look the harder it will be to find the actual recordings. My point is only that it is revisionist to call the Republicans the “"any election we don't win is fraudulent" party”, when both parties have indulged in that fantasy over and over. Honestly, it’s best to assume that both parties are cheating as hard as they possibly can. Certainly low–level frauds are found out in every election.
  - skinnymuch 4y ago
    It’s about relatives. The amount done for Trump in 2016 is no where close to 2020. It’s not even remotely close.
    - db48x 4y ago
      I’m sure we can defer to your superior counting skills.
      - skinnymuch 4y ago
        Yeah big stuff like google trends, headline counts, and various other possible statistics. Of course it’s not just my opinion.
deleted 4y ago
[deleted]
kmos17 4y ago
Ah the whattaboutism rears its head. Trump is the first candidate to refuse to concede a loss in a presidential election, even announcing before the election that he would refuse to accept a loss. Clinton conceded to him even though she was ahead by more then 3 million votes. There always were election deniers, just never a sitting president willing to push his supporters to attack congress because he didn’t want to concede and then cowardly abandon them once they failed overturning the certification. You could also count Stacy Abrams although considering her opponent was in charge of the electoral process her reluctance to concede could be a bit more understandable.

newaccount2021 4y ago

sarcasmatwork 4y ago

You mean the Dems? Here's 12min of Dems doing what you're trying to blame GOP for. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XX2Ejqjz6TA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XX2Ejqjz6TA China controls the Bidens, not the GOP. You have your parties mixed up.