>A crash dummy aimed at protecting women drivers The title of the article that we are currently discussing. Please don't pretend your comment doesn't exist in

>A crash dummy aimed at protecting women drivers The title of the article that we are currently discussing. Please don't pretend your comment doesn't exist in the context of the discussion it's a reply to, that's somewhere between dishonest motte-and-bailey and blatantly bad comment etiquette. (And beyond that, you're not even using a proper application of Bayes Law anyway, since "probability of injury if you are a woman" is what you should be concerned with if you're building safety devices)