3 ms·
Raptor Lake is roughly equivalent in perf/watt to Zen 4 and Apple's M series, at least going by eco mode benchmarks. Seems like E cores would get better idle co
by howinteresting 4y ago
Raptor Lake is roughly equivalent in perf/watt to Zen 4 and Apple's M series, at least going by eco mode benchmarks. Seems like E cores would get better idle consumption as well.
The days of 14nm+++++++ are over.
edit: sorry meant Raptor Lake.
- CameronNemo 4y agoI have a hard time believing that Intel is beating Apple Silicon in performance per watt.
- howinteresting 4y agoSo did I until I saw the Cinebench numbers at 65W.
- CameronNemo 4y agoSo why not link them?
- howinteresting 4y agoMostly because I can't find them with a quick Google search and I don't want to put more time into it. edit: found them: https://www.club386.com/intel-core-i9-13900k-vs-amd-ryzen-9-7950x-at-125w-and-65w/ https://www.club386.com/intel-core-i9-13900k-vs-amd-ryzen-9-... M1 ultra Cinebench is 21700 or so.