I can see you just trying to bait me into a non-productive debate, so I will say this. I am not going to make any statement regarding whether or not financial

I can see you just trying to bait me into a non-productive debate, so I will say this. I am not going to make any statement regarding whether or not financial crimes against known and convicted criminal enterprises should be deprioritized in relation to crimes against regular citizens. In this case though, the "victim" has not existed for over 9 years and will never exist in the future, there are no ongoing victism, and there are no downstream victims to return restitution to. I do not believe the justice department should be pursuing cases (cold or not) where the only goal is siezing (not recovering) assets for their own benefit.