3 ms·
The argument is that society would be better off the the inventor licensed (or sold outright) to a company that will actually use the patent. Instead of to a NP
by alistairSH 4y ago
The argument is that society would be better off the the inventor licensed (or sold outright) to a company that will actually use the patent. Instead of to a NPE that exists only to sue.
If an inventor just wants to sit on a patent and not produce anything based on it, they should be forced to (eventually, though I have no idea what timeframe would be optimal) release their rights.
- yieldcrv 4y agoThat’s an ok argument but you know why that doesn’t happen right? Companies get defensive at the mere suggestion of paying anything, NPE streamlines the process