6 ms·

> No. The guy he "wanted to kill" was a moderator who didn't even steal from him. Ross Ulbricht commissioned 5 murders fully expecting each of them to be carri

> No. The guy he "wanted to kill" was a moderator who didn't even steal from him. Ross Ulbricht commissioned 5 murders fully expecting each of them to be carried out. > All that for no tangible investigative benefit other then strengthen their 2yr old bro-bond. The murder-for-hire evidence denied him bail. But the prosecutor already had Ulbricht nailed and decided to avoid complicating the case by formally filing the murder-for-hire charges. Would your tax dollars have been better used if Mr. Ulbricht had additional life sentences and decades of prison? No, he is going to die in a prison cell either way. Ross Ulbricht built his empire, in large part, by profiting off people's suffering. And he exhibited time and time again that he would murder people to protect it. He is nothing short of evil.

tptacek 4y ago
A reminder that the murder-for-hire schemes were a predicate of the conspiracy charge in his indictment; he was in part charged for them.
- notch656a 4y ago
  But conspiracy charge depends on overt act(s), so being convicted of conspiracy doesn't necessarily mean he was convicted on the basis that particular overt act occurred. The prosecution never had to prove all the overt acts, including murder-for-hire, were true to convict for the more generalized non-murder conspiracy. Just that some subset of overt acts were true.
  - xapata 4y ago
    > prove There are different levels of proof. For example, civil court only requires a preponderance of evidence.
gonehome 4y ago
It might have been worth them formally filing the murder-for-hire charges just to save us from having to read his supporters repeatedly say they weren't real.
- notch656a 4y ago
  Don't worry, even though he wasn't convicted of them, his sentencing included the alleged activity and punished him for it anyway!
onemoresoop 4y ago
In my opinion the Sackler family has cause a lot more suffering and they see no day in prison. And they're not the only lords who get away with murder. Yet a guy like Ulbricht gets to spend a lifetime in jail... This is a miscarriage of justice unless all monsters are locked up and all would be fair. It could be argued that Ulbricht caused no suffering but alleviated it by providing a service for people to buy their "drugs" by skipping meeting a shady dealer...
- usrusr 4y ago
  That alleged right of criminals to be persecuted in strictly descending order of severity simply does not exist. Finding some bigger wrong does not make a right.
  - BLKNSLVR 4y ago
    > That alleged right of criminals to be persecuted in strictly descending order of severity simply does not exist. Exactly. Justice does not exist at that level of wealth, and this is a core problem in western society. Well pointed out.
    - prottog 4y ago
      > this is a core problem in western society Are there any societies, historical or current, where the extremely rich and powerful face justice in the way you would like, other than by pissing off other extremely rich and powerful people?
      - lozenge 4y ago
        In China they say you can get away with anything as long as nobody dies. For example, in the 2008 Chinese milk scandal, two people were sentenced to death and three received life sentences.
      - BLKNSLVR 4y ago
        I did wonder whether I should include 'western' or not. I probably shouldn't have, since, I agree with your point, it's not a area that distinguishes western from non-western.
kcatskcolbdi 4y ago
> Ross Ulbricht built his empire, in large part, by profiting off people's suffering. He built Silk Road, which allowed people to sell drugs to one another. If the 'people's suffering' you are referencing is the use of drugs, I hope you have this same ire for the pharmaceutical companies and physicians prescribing opioids linked to over 500k deaths in the US over the past two decades[1]. I hope you feel the same ire for the CIA who facilitated and supported the Nicaraguan Contra groups' smuggling of crack into the US to finance their coup attempt[2]. I would hope the "nothing short of evil" rhetoric isn't exclusively saved for the kid who built an onion site and then was entrapped by FBI agents into a murder-for-hire scheme of their creation. [1]https://www.npr.org/2022/11/02/1133523740/cvs-health-agrees-to-a-5-billion-settlement-in-opioid-lawsuits https://www.npr.org/2022/11/02/1133523740/cvs-health-agrees-... [2]https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB113/north06.pdf https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB113/north06.pdf
- IncRnd 4y ago
  >> Ross Ulbricht built his empire, in large part, by profiting off people's suffering. > He built Silk Road, which allowed people to sell drugs to one another. Actually, that's the tiniest part. [1] The Silk Road was an online black market where buyers and sellers of illegal or unethical items could transact anonymously. Utilizing privacy techniques such as the Tor network and cryptocurrency transactions, people were able to transact in drugs, hacked passwords, illegal data, and other contraband. Or, you could look at how he used Silk Road, to contract killers. [2] MANY OF THE ideological supporters of the Silk Road have described its sprawling online black market for drugs as an experiment in victimless crime and a nonviolent alternative to the bloody turf wars of the streets. But prosecutors in the trial of Ross Ulbricht, the 30-year-old accused of running that anonymous bazaar, have pointed to one conversation they say shows the contrary: That the Silk Road's boss was willing to resort to the drug trade's most violent measures when it suited his needs. [1] https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/silk-road.asp https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/silk-road.asp [2] https://www.wired.com/2015/02/read-transcript-silk-roads-boss-ordering-5-assassinations/ https://www.wired.com/2015/02/read-transcript-silk-roads-bos...
  - 4y ago
deleted 4y ago
[deleted]
pmarreck 4y ago
> built his empire, in large part, by profiting off people's suffering. LOL. Wow. You clearly have no sense for nuance whatsoever. https://www.wired.com/2014/06/silk-road-study/ https://www.wired.com/2014/06/silk-road-study/ https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2013/10/did-shutting-down-silk-road-make-the-world-a-more-dangerous-place/280270/ https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2013/10/did-s... Silk Road reduced deaths in a black market that was always there and would always continue to be there regardless of the presence of Silk Road. Period. Given that black markets are going to continue to exist, since anti-drug laws are dumb (just like Prohibition was; regulation of an irrepressible market is always superior to "illegalization" in a vain attempt to suppress it), it is at least less bad if there are fewer killings. Entrapment is unethical precisely because you can use it to enforce a law regardless of the ethical justification of the law. If it was a capital offense to have sex before marriage in 2040 in the United Christian Dictatorship of America, and another Ross Ulbricht type came along and made it possible for teens to seek and meet in secret online, and a christo-fascist cop pretended to be a hot girl on said system while pretending to threaten to take the whole thing down unless a ransom was paid, and ANOTHER christo-fascist cop (or the same one pretending to be someone else) offered a "solution" to this by "getting rid of" the "problem"... Do you see where I'm going with this? Future Ross Ulbricht just wanted people to be able to find physical love before committing to wed!! Certainly not guilty enough to do life in prison, because no actual murders ever actually occurred.

tptacek 4y ago

A reminder that the murder-for-hire schemes were a predicate of the conspiracy charge in his indictment; he was in part charged for them.

notch656a 4y ago
But conspiracy charge depends on overt act(s), so being convicted of conspiracy doesn't necessarily mean he was convicted on the basis that particular overt act occurred. The prosecution never had to prove all the overt acts, including murder-for-hire, were true to convict for the more generalized non-murder conspiracy. Just that some subset of overt acts were true.
- xapata 4y ago
  > prove There are different levels of proof. For example, civil court only requires a preponderance of evidence.

gonehome 4y ago

It might have been worth them formally filing the murder-for-hire charges just to save us from having to read his supporters repeatedly say they weren't real.

notch656a 4y ago
Don't worry, even though he wasn't convicted of them, his sentencing included the alleged activity and punished him for it anyway!

onemoresoop 4y ago

In my opinion the Sackler family has cause a lot more suffering and they see no day in prison. And they're not the only lords who get away with murder. Yet a guy like Ulbricht gets to spend a lifetime in jail... This is a miscarriage of justice unless all monsters are locked up and all would be fair. It could be argued that Ulbricht caused no suffering but alleviated it by providing a service for people to buy their "drugs" by skipping meeting a shady dealer...

usrusr 4y ago
That alleged right of criminals to be persecuted in strictly descending order of severity simply does not exist. Finding some bigger wrong does not make a right.
- BLKNSLVR 4y ago
  > That alleged right of criminals to be persecuted in strictly descending order of severity simply does not exist. Exactly. Justice does not exist at that level of wealth, and this is a core problem in western society. Well pointed out.
  - prottog 4y ago
    > this is a core problem in western society Are there any societies, historical or current, where the extremely rich and powerful face justice in the way you would like, other than by pissing off other extremely rich and powerful people?
    - lozenge 4y ago
      In China they say you can get away with anything as long as nobody dies. For example, in the 2008 Chinese milk scandal, two people were sentenced to death and three received life sentences.
    - BLKNSLVR 4y ago
      I did wonder whether I should include 'western' or not. I probably shouldn't have, since, I agree with your point, it's not a area that distinguishes western from non-western.

kcatskcolbdi 4y ago

> Ross Ulbricht built his empire, in large part, by profiting off people's suffering. He built Silk Road, which allowed people to sell drugs to one another. If the 'people's suffering' you are referencing is the use of drugs, I hope you have this same ire for the pharmaceutical companies and physicians prescribing opioids linked to over 500k deaths in the US over the past two decades[1]. I hope you feel the same ire for the CIA who facilitated and supported the Nicaraguan Contra groups' smuggling of crack into the US to finance their coup attempt[2]. I would hope the "nothing short of evil" rhetoric isn't exclusively saved for the kid who built an onion site and then was entrapped by FBI agents into a murder-for-hire scheme of their creation. [1]https://www.npr.org/2022/11/02/1133523740/cvs-health-agrees-to-a-5-billion-settlement-in-opioid-lawsuits https://www.npr.org/2022/11/02/1133523740/cvs-health-agrees-... [2]https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB113/north06.pdf https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB113/north06.pdf

IncRnd 4y ago
>> Ross Ulbricht built his empire, in large part, by profiting off people's suffering. > He built Silk Road, which allowed people to sell drugs to one another. Actually, that's the tiniest part. [1] The Silk Road was an online black market where buyers and sellers of illegal or unethical items could transact anonymously. Utilizing privacy techniques such as the Tor network and cryptocurrency transactions, people were able to transact in drugs, hacked passwords, illegal data, and other contraband. Or, you could look at how he used Silk Road, to contract killers. [2] MANY OF THE ideological supporters of the Silk Road have described its sprawling online black market for drugs as an experiment in victimless crime and a nonviolent alternative to the bloody turf wars of the streets. But prosecutors in the trial of Ross Ulbricht, the 30-year-old accused of running that anonymous bazaar, have pointed to one conversation they say shows the contrary: That the Silk Road's boss was willing to resort to the drug trade's most violent measures when it suited his needs. [1] https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/silk-road.asp https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/silk-road.asp [2] https://www.wired.com/2015/02/read-transcript-silk-roads-boss-ordering-5-assassinations/ https://www.wired.com/2015/02/read-transcript-silk-roads-bos...
- 4y ago

deleted 4y ago

[deleted]

pmarreck 4y ago

> built his empire, in large part, by profiting off people's suffering. LOL. Wow. You clearly have no sense for nuance whatsoever. https://www.wired.com/2014/06/silk-road-study/ https://www.wired.com/2014/06/silk-road-study/ https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2013/10/did-shutting-down-silk-road-make-the-world-a-more-dangerous-place/280270/ https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2013/10/did-s... Silk Road reduced deaths in a black market that was always there and would always continue to be there regardless of the presence of Silk Road. Period. Given that black markets are going to continue to exist, since anti-drug laws are dumb (just like Prohibition was; regulation of an irrepressible market is always superior to "illegalization" in a vain attempt to suppress it), it is at least less bad if there are fewer killings. Entrapment is unethical precisely because you can use it to enforce a law regardless of the ethical justification of the law. If it was a capital offense to have sex before marriage in 2040 in the United Christian Dictatorship of America, and another Ross Ulbricht type came along and made it possible for teens to seek and meet in secret online, and a christo-fascist cop pretended to be a hot girl on said system while pretending to threaten to take the whole thing down unless a ransom was paid, and ANOTHER christo-fascist cop (or the same one pretending to be someone else) offered a "solution" to this by "getting rid of" the "problem"... Do you see where I'm going with this? Future Ross Ulbricht just wanted people to be able to find physical love before committing to wed!! Certainly not guilty enough to do life in prison, because no actual murders ever actually occurred.